Flexplay: The Disposable DVD that Failed (Thankfully)

Share
HTML-code
  • Published: 28 April 2019
  • You can support this channel on Patreon! Link below
    Have you ever run across a cool idea that you desperately hope doesn’t catch on? Flexplay is one of those. In this video, we’ll talk about what it is, why it was crazy to think it would go anywhere, and why it’s probably a good thing it didn’t.

    Did you know you can follow these links? It’s pretty neat. I heard about it on the Internet.

    Technology Connections on Twitter:
    twitter.com/TechConnectify

    The TC Subreddit
    reddit.com/r/technologyconnections

    Technology Connections 2 (the channel where I sometimes talk about stuff and generally don’t prepare for anything):
    http://superiorjanitorial.pro/channel/UClRwC5Vc8HrB6vGx6Ti-lhA

    You can support this channel on Patreon! It has been amazing what Patreon has done for this channel, but also for me (your dorky host) personally. Through the support of people just like you, Technology Connections has become my job and I am so excited and thankful for it! If you’d like to join the fine folks in a pledge to help the channel grow, please check out my Patreon page. Thank you for your consideration!
    patreon.com/technologyconnections

    And thank you to the following Patrons!

    Phillip Cosgrove, Joshua Doades, Ennex The Fox, Steve Kralik, Your name, Kirill Polstainen, Felix Winkelnkemper, Christopher Lawhead, BoostCookie, 98abaile, Rennix, Charles, Sebastian Sparrer, Andreas Kuzma, Paul Moffat, Max, Ryan Benson, Neil Forker, Vincent Beelte, James Pinakis, Johnni Winther, Mark Hesse, Nathan Blubaugh, Andre van Soest, lululombard, Armando Fox, Nelson, Kajico, Angelo van der Sijpt, William Evans, Philip, VilleS, Anton Afanasev, Kilrah, Ray, Liam O'Flynn, Oliver Lee, Lennart Sorensen, Mitch Radoll, Will Wren, Viorel, Reaghan Kekeis, lohphat, Vivian Pypher, Brandon Whiting, Peter Stewart, Patrick Barry, Robin Johnsen, Nomad, Eric, Phia Westfall, Mats Svardal, Jeremey Hastings, Mark Wayt, Matthew Reynolds, Dave Howlett, Arthur Robillard, Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog, Lee Tustain, Lauren Hahn, kalleboo, Marcel de Jong, Vaughn B., Braden McDorman, Stephen Bank, Julien Oster, Dr. Bjoern Bieber, Anders Enger Jensen, Juan Molinari, Jake Hickman, Trae Palmer, Gary Hampson, Lennart Rosam, Chris Wallace, Matt Shea, Jason Baker, PJ Gunasekera, Adisibio, Michael Holmes, Trey Harris, Peter Pfundstein, Wilhelm Screamer, Mat Stu, RYAN NGOGLIA, Charlycobra, Thomas Kolanus, William Kisley, Daniel Johnson, Potch, Reemt Rühmkorf, Jack Nichol, Robin Rattay, Bruce Justyn, Rae McIntosh, Justin D, Adam Zawisza, LordJakson, Triancia, Max Barnash, Microfrost, MrSonicOSG, Sinirlan, rusty shakelford, Mitch Schenk, Juan Olivares, Mike Bird, Emmett Ray, Michael Shaffer, Steve Trambert, Sputnik, Jason Spriggs, Danny S., Gregory Kumpula, Chris Zaremba, Tom Burns, Daniel Pf, Yung Kim, John W Campbell, Matthew Jones, Slappy826, Steven Ingles, Robert Howcroft, Troy King, Some Random, Peter Sarossy, Leigh Beattie, Tracy Cogsdill, Matt Allaire, Dave Mausner, Guy, John Hickey, Benjamin Gott, Luke, Rayne Luna, Zach Le, Fredrik Østrem, Greg Hodgdon, Anil Dash, Michael Wileczka, Chris Wolf, John Ehler, William Matthews, Fred Leckie, Julian Zielke, John Rogers, Kenneth Morenz, Andy, Greg Stearns, Linus Eustace, Zack, Robert L LaBelle, Chris Satterfield (Compgeke), Brian Johnson, Jon Hay, Hyunseung Park, Cameron Benton, Samuli Suomi, Keith McCready, Jeffrey Glover, John Marshall, Hsin-Kuei Chen, Henry Desai, Damian, David Anez, Josiah Keller, M T Bono, Conall Ó Maitiú, Struan Clark, Keeb, Tarrien, Manuel Zeschko, Biking With Panda, Chris Larsen, David Pechon, Michael Romero, Jonathon Mah, Jonathan Polirer, Derek Nickel, Marc Versailles, Ian Pirner, Mark Stone, Adelaide Leslie Baker, Arthur Zalevsky, John Fruetel, Jonathan Mayfield, Adam Veneziano, Andrew Diamond, Cole Campbell, Christopher Beattie, Paul Bryan, Samuel Kirzner, Gus Polly, a ray, Daniel Pritchard, Brandon Tomlinson, Eric Loewenthal, Sebastian Stenner, Leftie, Jeremy Samuels, Malcolm Miles, Matthew Lloyd, David L Jones, Matthew Burket, Mike Burns, Andrew Roland, Luke Whiting, John Cockerill, Smith8154, David Groover, Michael Wehner, Rainbow Warrior, jacob kamphaus, Alex Hurley, Andrew Bobulsky, Jennifer Briggs, Peter Beckman, Matthew R, Richard Sams, Andy Kettu, On Ice Perspectives, Brian Wright, TheGreatCO, Sam Lowry, Marcus, Ethan R, Petteri Hjort, Daniel DeLage, Nathan Obuchowski, Sam Tran, Shaun Puzon, Bret Holmes, Vlycop, Alexandra Stanovska, Tom Ebenhoe, Casey Blackburn

    Pst! If you haven’t seen your name here, don’t worry quite yet! The Patron list is in a state of transition and you might be appearing somewhere else, shortly!
  • Science and Technology Science and Technology

Comments • 5 943

  • Technology Connections
    Technology Connections   7 months back

    I mentioned the tragedy of the commons a couple of times in this video. This is an old but (in my opinion) underutilized term for the concept of what happens when shared resources are used by individuals acting in their own best interest. Although the term is flawed and some situations are far more complex than can be explained in four easy words, it’s a useful reminder that things that seem harmless on an individual level can scale in ways we can’t grasp. If you’d like to learn a little more about this concept, check out this website I found; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

    • Patrick Elliott
      Patrick Elliott  1 weeks back

      @jb05 Criticized the author? I suppose it could be interpreted that way. But, I think its perfectly relevant to criticize people for promoting ideas that are not founded on fact. His book *specifically* referenced people who had limited resources, raising, I believe it was sheep, and claimed, without evidence, facts, statistics, or *anything* to support the assertion, that such people could not collectively come to reasoned agreements on how to handle the limited grazing land available. He claimed that they would, inevitably, cheat each other. His "solution" was a benevolent single person, with a better understanding of the resources, who could effectively take over and decide for everyone else, because of their superior vision, and supposed skill, how to use those resources.


      The problem was, even then, that people had been doing *precisely* what he claimed was impossible for centuries, without his benevolent dictator needing to be involved at all. The second problem, of course, is that we can see, quite clearly, how such supposed, "single people, who know better", actually act, once they have control over other people's assets - it invariably leads to over use of the resources, deals being cut that cheat the people that are supposedly being "helped" out of the deals, and other one sided benefits, purely to the individual that took over, and a few cronies, at the expense of everyone else, and more often than not an arrogant disregard of the realities of the situation, which have literally ended businesses, at a rate nearly as great as that in which they are created, due to utter failure to recognize their own errors.


      So, no, I am not, "criticizing the author, instead of his ideas". His idea was a literal thought experiment. His theory about what would take place not based on any understanding of what really happens even with his own chosen example. And, finally, his proposed solution the intervention of someone who doesn't exist, with knowledge they could not possibly posses (in excess of the people actually raising the animals especially), and which, even in his own time, led, invariably, to hubris and failure, when it failed, and, when it did work, profit only for those "controlling" this supposed salvation (who then, time and time again, simply walked away, when the long term consequences caught up with their grand ideas, and they become no longer viable).


      There literally is *no such thing* as a tragedy of the commons. He made up the problem, made up the example, then made up the solution, all without *any* evidence to support any of it. So.. What idea did he have again, exactly? And, why shouldn't one criticize the man who made it all up, the same way one rightly mocks someone that makes up a story of UFO abductions?


      I suspect we are not far off in what we "do" agree on, but.. I suspect a bit of naivete on your part about the actual framework on which "most of not all" of what we think of as capitalism is built on today. Its telling, for example, that my father worked for a man that spent 50 years telling the people that worked in one department of his company, "I like to see you just sitting around doing nothing, because I know that if you are not actively fixing something *every other part of my company is making money*.", and that this was, if not a universal concept across all industries (Ford had a similar view of people that repaired his assembly lines), it was part and parcel to the idea that the people that worked for you should be as invested in your business as you are, and to get them there you had to treat them almost like family, while today almost every MBA program in the world is taught by some variant of "economic libertarianism", the ludicrous assertion that companies, like individual people, should have near unfettered rights, can be run by people with, "enlightened self interest", and should be mostly unregulated if they are to be profitable. A joke that utterly ignores the fact that no company in the world, and the ones in the US are 10 times worse, is without lawyers to defend them against legitimate questions about their actions, lobbyists, whose job is to get rid of, or twist, regulations to avoid real consequences (or necessary action), as well as undermine legislation to help the public, at the expense of the company, advertising that is designed to con people into wanting things, instead of asking, "What do people actually *need*", and paid think tanks, which exist solely to lie, convincingly, about how the things the companies do, make, mine, pump, or dumb are, "Not really dangerous to the public."


      Kind of begs the question - if the leader(s) of such companies are actually enlightened, and desire the public good, why the F do they need *any* of those things? Odd, huh? Yet, this is the spiel a lot of MBA programs have pushed for decades now - employees are replaceable, and don't matter. Everyone is out to get your money. You need to protect *everything* because *everyone* is out to get you. And, you need all those lawyers, lobbyists, paid shills, advertisers, etc. to fight back against everyone trying to destroy you.


      Oh, they don't say it in exactly those words, precisely, but.. again, why actually have any of those things, unless profit is king, and everyone else is just a thief? And, why make *everything* about how efficient everything is, and how much you can shave off costs, and... Because of competitiveness?


      Well, sort of, but.. just looking at the tech industry itself, almost ever "dead" company failed for one of only a few reasons - not realizing that the tech they where trying to create was not possible yet, but going for it anyway, where drown out by people that cut every corner, including what they paid the people that worked for them (often then killing themselves in the process, inevitably), being buried under IP lawsuits, which they couldn't afford to actually fight, or just flat out failing to comprehend that they where selling something that no one wanted (or they couldn't figure out themselves well enough to freaking explain it).


      Rarely was it ever because they made a "superior product", and someone else somehow just won anyway.


      I can understand failing to succeed, failing to understand your market, etc. But.. being sued out of competition?


      We get something similar with the way law works for "individuals" when either suing, or being sued, by someone (or a corporation) with a lot more money. Only a handful of states disallow "slapp" suits. Yet, the entire country disallows "individual" law suits against corporations. Yet, the argument of the latter is the same as for the former - they are supposedly "overwhelming the courts with frivolous suits". So.. We replaced the right of single people to sue companies for their wrong doing, calling it frivolous, with nearly unfettered, and unlimited right of companies (or just people with enough money) to sue to bankrupt individuals, to shut them up... Oh, and.. We are one of the only countries in the world that requires the "winning" side to pay its own lawyer fees (thus also bankrupting private citizens, while companies and the rich can just shrug off the cost of the lawyers).


      Even the legal system has been stacked against sane capitalism. And, most of the arguments in favor of doing this, and/or keeping it this way, come from "experts", who, more often than not, do nothing but make shit up (sometimes literally being paid to do so, and only that).


      So, again, we might both agree on the bigger picture, possibly.. But.. this is a bit like noticing the tornado, but not where the tail is actually hitting the ground. Its "why" things are screwed up, who, and what, arguments are being made to defend this madness, and *if* any of them are based on anything but the wishful thinking of the people in charge of it, which matter.


      Remember, when the housing bubble fell, 90% of the "experts" couldn't comprehend why it happened, because they had all bought into the current "model" of economics, which said that, "As long as variable X kept rising, nothing could go wrong." The other 10%, didn't trust the model (which had failed the last dozen times as well, when some joker decided that, "If Q keeps rising...", or, "if P keeps rising..." But, all the variables everyone else was ignoring where, to them, screaming, "Storm system. Tornadoes are possible!"

    • jb05
      jb05  1 weeks back

      @Patrick Elliott Your criticism of the author of the tragedy of the commons is irrelevant. The fact that you're criticizing the author rather than the ideas he presents is a simple deflection. I know nothing of the author, nor do I care to. I'm interested in the idea, the logic, the parable of the story, not in the specific person who put pen to paper. Are you suggesting we reject ideas, inventions, etc if we disagree with the author or creator? That may well be your viewpoint, but it's a short-sighted one.
      "It is the mark of an educated mind that can entertain a thought without accepting it"


      Regarding your more specific criticisms of capitalism, you mention diamond scarcity (or lack thereof), abuse of IP, etc. I agree with you, I just think your criticisms are imprecise and misdirected. I too abhor consumerism, advertising and the broken modern copyright system. I don't abhor capitalism altogether. Monopolies are harmful to consumers and are best either broken up or strictly regulated. Barriers to entry for new competitors are best kept low in order to keep a competitive market. That doesn't mean a totalitarian command economy would yield the best results. Nor would I agree that socialist nationalization of certain sectors is beneficial.

    • Patrick Elliott
      Patrick Elliott  1 weeks back

      @jb05 Oh, give me a break. Nice job putting words into someone's mouth. I will note however that the so called, "tragedy of the commons", was a made up story, tacked onto a thought experiment, by someone vastly arrogant, and having no actually real world knowledge to back up his paranoia. Funny thing - seems like the "commons", and specifically people like the ones he described, tended to have a good, solid, grasp of what was possible, how much resources where actually available, and how to effectively manage those resources for the good of their community. It was always the outside a-hole that showed up with a big plan, great dreams, and a callous disregard for everyone else's pre-existing knowledge that invariably f-ed things up.


      While it is true that more complex societies, especially those using technologies that require a wide range of hard to get resources, often requires a capitalist style solution, it is not a *necessity* that those people would, should, or must inevitably, be allowed unrestrained self interest, at the expense of basic freaking reality - i.e., exploitation of those resources in a manner that leads to inevitable extinction of the resource. Nope, that seems to be an entirely modern tragedy of those who suffer from the conceit that, "I don't need to worry about this resource expiring, since someone will 'invent' a solution before that happens!"


      So, I dare say I have a fair grasp of both the limitations, and conditions under which some form of capitalist trade can happen, and what screws it up. And, it always starts with one self proclaimed "genius" deciding that they know better than dozens, or more, people, who have been solving problems, and trading fairly, for decades, or even centuries, showing up and saying, "You are all idiots. I have a better way that will make us all rich!"


      Sure there have been conflicts, likely since the dawn of human civilization. The problem is, war, strife, and conflict over them always *always* arises under extreme stress situations - where a resource that is absolutely needed (or is merely perceived is absolutely necessary) hits a real (or sadly, completely made up) scarcity, which makes it impossible to trade fairly at all. Two tribes, in a drought, with only one crop, which isn't enough to feed both, might cause this - due to entirely naturally causes. Some nitwit wanting to make a replica Frabrige egg, and deciding to steal diamonds from someone else - well, that is an entirely human, made up, BS "scarcity" - given that diamonds are actually so freaking common that, if they cost their true value it would be not much more than a few dollars more than buying a bag of dyed beach sand.


      The problem with modern capitalism is that it has convinced people that the latter kind of "scarcity" is sensible, and right, and somehow necessary (or worse, harmless), even when it not useless, but pretty diamonds, but, say, billions of pounds of unsold food (or advertising driving people to buy animal products, which costs many times more resources in food to raise and slaughter, in most cases, than you would need if you just feed people with the grain.


      Modern capitalism doesn't give a damn about what makes sense, is efficient, is actually sustainable, or *anything else*, just how much money the owner of all the IP can scam off of people that no longer know any better, because one of the things they have lied about is how "stupid" the "commons" are, compared to the guy that can sell ice to Eskimos.

    • jb05
      jb05  1 weeks back

      @Patrick Elliott So people never acted in their own self interest, and never had conflict over resources, until capitalism was "invented?" Do you understand how ridiculous your statement is? Capitalism is the free exchange of goods and services. Nothing more. It's not a dirty word. It wasn't invented in a lab by some mischevious villain twirling his moustache. It's the opposite of a command economy.
      But please, tell us more about how capitalism was invented. Tell us how primitive hunter-gatherer societies lived in tightly controlled command economies and gathered only what the politburo directed.

    • 5Andysalive
      5Andysalive  2 weeks back

      Failed completely to mention billions of never-recycled AOL cd's.


      Also this tragedy of the commons will hit when (if) electric cars become more common. Once we're dealing with billions of massive batteries, it will hit hard.

  • WRLD OverHeaven
    WRLD OverHeaven  19 minutes back

    No sane person would ever return a copy of Shrek 2.

    • DjBeatz _
      DjBeatz _  6 hours back

      All I hear is the high pitch noise from the TV

      Other than that it was a good video

      • LittleShadowGames
        LittleShadowGames  8 hours back

        Thanks, Youtube Recommended. I'm now watching this at 2 AM instead of sleeping.

        • Arvu ReBantra
          Arvu ReBantra  10 hours back

          The "travel centers" you mentioned are actually truck stops. As a former truck driver, I can tell you that many truckers had mini DVD players and such. This isn't about airport "business travelers" as you thought, but about some tired truck driver.
          It COULD have worked, but Red Box is a far better service. They were basically targetting a very small group. It would have been great for US truck drivers, but not for the business.

          • pokemonmanic3595
            pokemonmanic3595  10 hours back

            Flexplay is like the Mr. Meeseeks of DVDs

            • alan koza
              alan koza  15 hours back

              Dvd and blue ray are finneshed.

              • Kathryn Orvis
                Kathryn Orvis  16 hours back

                10:32 is the best revenge meme in the whole video XD!

                • Ricky Witte
                  Ricky Witte  1 days back

                  "Future proof"

                  What

                  • IntelliPocalypse
                    IntelliPocalypse  1 days back

                    Maybe just pirate the movie from the disc. That’s what people would wind up doing

                    • ERUS THE DEER
                      ERUS THE DEER  2 days back

                      finally, thank youtube recommendations, i search for this video for a long time

                      • KroneYT
                        KroneYT  2 days back

                        I thought this video was going to be about some disposable DVD player that came with a rental movie that literally blew up after one viewing of a movie

                        • Cadde
                          Cadde  2 days back

                          There's a good reason we have high speed internet connections today. And it's NOT because of the media industry pushing to create streaming services.
                          They wanted us to pay overprices for useless physical media FOREVER and EVER into the future. They had a whole distribution chain set up with several thousand men in the middle stuffing their pockets with our hard earned cash for doing nothing more than simply touching the media as it passed through.

                          "I laid my hand on this pallet of DVD's so i want my $100,000 now thank you very much!"

                          No, the reason is piracy. It started off strong in Europe, especially northern Europe. The consumers screamed for higher download (and upload) speeds to their ISP's and if the ISP didn't comply the consumer would move to the one ISP that offered the fastest internet connection, whichever it was at the time.
                          The consumers wanted fast internet so they could download movies and games and whatever else faster as this "streaming" of media was the most convenient (and also of course free) way of getting the things they wanted. It started off with a CD (700 mb) movie taking between 4 and 12 hours or so to download with a 512 kbit internet connection. (The variance in time was dependant on the sharing parts upload speed and how many were connecting to that one share)
                          Then it went faster and faster as more people got 1 mbit, 2 mbit, 5 mbit, 10 mbit, 100 mbit and now 1 gigabit and beyond internet connections.

                          Today one can download a blu-ray movie at 16 gigabytes in as little as 5 minutes. (Theoretically 2 minutes and 25 seconds but you know, overhead and whatnot)

                          Things like YouTube, Netflix, Steam, Spotify and even FaceBook (ugh) would not have existed (yet) without this drive to make the internet super fast so one could download a movie or game for free back in the golden era of online piracy.
                          We have that era to thank for getting low cost (almost affordable) media delivered directly to our home entertainment system (or gaming machine) at the press of a button.

                          • Cadde
                            Cadde  2 days back

                            I can assure you that streaming services are much more environmentally sane than physical media.
                            Having bookshelves full of physical media you only really tend to watch at best once a year is extremely wasteful too.

                            Streaming services constantly adapt to the demands. It's not like they have thousands of servers just sitting there waiting for someone to make a request. They are part of a bigger "cloud" or rather a data center that serves up all kinds of different requested data. If demand sinks, servers go to sleep automatically until needed again at which point they fire up and meet the increase in demands.

                            I shouldn't have to explain what makes electrical signals and fiber optics be friendlier to the environment than loading a bunch of plastics onto a truck, then onto a boat, then onto a train and finally onto a truck to go to the store shelves... Just to be picked up by a consumer and left on a shelf at their home for years without much use until finally thrown out because it no longer plays or is simply too inconvenient to just streaming the movie.

                            Sure, electricity use does impact the environment but not nearly as much as producing, transporting and storing some physical media does.
                            The mere fact that we keep (kept) those things around on shelves meant we wasted a lot of energy just to keep those media protected from the environment as part of our already too big living space.
                            If we didn't keep a bunch of junk around in our homes, we could easily live in spaces as small as 30 square meters (322 square feet) but hey, we are human and we like to have unused shit lying around because we might actually use it again sometime. Meanwhile we pay extra every week/month just to keep that stuff stored at home or at some other location.

                            • Daylan
                              Daylan  2 days back

                              I mean, it wasn't pointless for the recycling portion because if they got it from a grocery store, 9/10 times that person is going back to that store at some point anyway, so they still could've worked, but streaming eventually took over and now look at us, basically paying for cable again.

                              IMO If streaming services are going to be a thing, they need to make a better competitive price since there are so many streaming services now. If someone wanted all of them, they'll be basically paying for the same amount as cable, which is why streaming started in the first place and I don't subscribe to that notion. Ease of access means more cash flow in the long run. But maybe I'm talking out of my ass 🤷🏼‍♂️

                              • Johnathan King
                                Johnathan King  3 days back

                                waste of money and resources.

                                • uriahedwardsmusic
                                  uriahedwardsmusic  3 days back

                                  Future proofing successful

                                  • back up
                                    back up  3 days back

                                    They could have put it in argon so you would at least be able store on shelves

                                    • Jack Newark
                                      Jack Newark  3 days back

                                      Flex On!

                                      • MitchBurns09
                                        MitchBurns09  3 days back

                                        Interesting watch, and actually couldn't have been done by a different personality

                                        • Mārtin
                                          Mārtin  3 days back

                                          Anything is disposable if you're brave enough.

                                          • parp12345
                                            parp12345  3 days back

                                            3:53 the DVD player was laughing like Muttley!

                                            • Dark Blu Mate
                                              Dark Blu Mate  3 days back

                                              This would have been a waste of dvds too

                                              • spacekitt3n
                                                spacekitt3n  4 days back

                                                That future proofing did you good my man!

                                                • gamekid06
                                                  gamekid06  4 days back

                                                  Where can I buy that t shirt?

                                                  • Billy Kidman
                                                    Billy Kidman  4 days back

                                                    One of my uncles was a trucker back around the dawn on Netflix and was absolutely obsessed with the service, going through literally hundreds of DVDs from new to broken a year, and he started using Netflix on his regular route in the most ingenious way, he'd map out what movies were coming out before his route, call ahead and have them mailed to truck centers he had called ahead to, or knew workers/owners personally, and would have a new movie waiting for him every stop the entire route, and return them either at one of the stops or all together after the route before heading home. And everytime he had to miss a stop or switch routes, he never once had a problem with getting the manager or worker at that stop to return his movie for him. He must have planned out hundreds of these truck stop Netflix deals before they started streaming and changed his life forever lol. Different times.

                                                    • Cat Onion
                                                      Cat Onion  4 days back

                                                      Love the way you present the topic. Subscribed!

                                                      • Shayna Pulley
                                                        Shayna Pulley  4 days back

                                                        Apologize to that DVD player for pushing its tray in like that. 🤮

                                                        • Whiffling Tit
                                                          Whiffling Tit  4 days back

                                                          The piece of toast killed me.

                                                          • james marshall
                                                            james marshall  5 days back

                                                            so whats the point then if you shouldnt open the box

                                                            • paweł roza
                                                              paweł roza  5 days back

                                                              2:45 Bread is not for throwing!!! respect it while you have it man....

                                                              • Charlie Bush
                                                                Charlie Bush  5 days back

                                                                Hey he was correct on his assumption of Disney+

                                                                • nomer440
                                                                  nomer440  5 days back

                                                                  Couldn’t you copy these EZD’s?

                                                                  • GeorgeTheFingers
                                                                    GeorgeTheFingers  5 days back

                                                                    In all honesty, it's kind of a miracle that Flexplay's patent for their self-destructing disc covered so many different ideas. It seems like, at least in the US, there'll be no chance of this concept affecting the environment on a grand scale again... if it sold enough to do so in the first place.

                                                                    • DanTheSasquatch
                                                                      DanTheSasquatch  5 days back

                                                                      Future proofing successful.

                                                                      • Willem Kossen
                                                                        Willem Kossen  5 days back

                                                                        so, when was stupidity erradicated? hint: it wasn't....

                                                                        • mdesm2005
                                                                          mdesm2005  5 days back

                                                                          too much about 'environmentalism' don't give the Greta/nut-cases so much attention

                                                                          • Stig Cruise
                                                                            Stig Cruise  6 days back

                                                                            So you could if you want to open it in an argon filled chamber . Figure out a way to seal whatever deteriorates from the oxygen and then use them forever lol

                                                                            • Tony Central
                                                                              Tony Central  6 days back

                                                                              Maybe they should of made biodegradable dvds made of sugar. Just add hot water to destroy it; Or even better eat it

                                                                              • Rob Middleton
                                                                                Rob Middleton  7 days back

                                                                                "According to this website I found..." 😂

                                                                                • Samantha Marie
                                                                                  Samantha Marie  7 days back

                                                                                  Oh it's a dub plate but for video

                                                                                  • Tahngarthor
                                                                                    Tahngarthor  7 days back

                                                                                    "...Disney+ (just trying to future proof here)" Well, that ended up being the final name lol...

                                                                                  • Steve Fisher-Stawinski
                                                                                    Steve Fisher-Stawinski  1 weeks back

                                                                                    Small comment on your reading of the principle Flexplay patent and characterizing it as "broad": you start reading from the specification text rather than the claims. It is the claims that define what is legally protected by the patent. The specification text that you quote is purposely broad to explain how the invention works in support of the claims. Thus, to properly comment on the breadth of any patent, use the claims, usually Claim 1.

                                                                                    • LectronCircuits
                                                                                      LectronCircuits  1 weeks back

                                                                                      Bank checks should use this technology. Cheers!

                                                                                      • BigHead2615
                                                                                        BigHead2615  1 weeks back

                                                                                        6:50 - or, if you're like me (stickittothemaneosis), you rip the film using a computer software that I won't mention here (seriously, prime example of "google is your friend"), and add it to your own private streaming database that works SIMILAR to Netflix and the like, but again it's your own private one... anyway, I've just always had an "anti-government" attitude, especially, and as you say a little further in than the timestamp I put in this comment (7:12 to be exact), if you decide to upgrade from an inferior format like VHS.... but, now I'm getting into piracy territory, and I don't condone that, but I do want to say that's always been my biggest gripe, is if you buy a movie ONCE in life, and 20 or 30 years later, you want to watch it again, but who can go back to VHS and VCR's with our 16:9 HD TV's (or better, 4k in most cases anymore)? I mean, $21.99 back in the day for Toy Story (or Toy Story 2, it was definitely that price for A Bug's Life) was a LOT of money, just to have a pan-and-scan VHS copy of the film. And my current gripe anymore, is how nearly EVERY online streaming service (and Disney is guilty of this as well, without going for the obvious example of "Song Of The South", try looking up just about ANYTHING between 1928 and 1950 - odds are it's just the well-loved and cherished classics like Dumbo, Pinocchio and Snow White, as well as Steamboat Willie... I don't have Disney+, because I don't want it, but I have family and friends that do, and I was having them look stuff up for me out of morbid curiosity, and while they DO have the original 1984 version of Frankenweenie, I don't believe they offer The Gallopin' Gaucho, or Plane Crazy), does NOT offer every known film ever, at least within reason (I can understand not offering "lost films", and since I was talking about Disney and Steamboat Willie a minute ago, here's a good example, Gang War was the 1928 film that Steamboat Willie originally was shown before, and that IS a lost film, you can not find or see Gang War in any shape or form anymore), but I mean, say I'm in the mood for Tron, or Starman, or Back To The Future, or Class Of 1984, or Amadeus, or Dennis The Menace... 9 times out of 10 when I AM in the mood for any of these, Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime DO NOT have them for free streaming! And I know, SOMETIMES they do offer some of these - it's always conveniently when I'm not in the mood for them :\
                                                                                        Ok, I apologize, where the hell did this long rant come from, I only meant to pipe in my little bit about my love... no, my fascination of ripping DVD's and being able to keep enjoying watching those films, on a Plex server, when the discs may not still be pristine as the day I bought them - a good 50% of my discs are scratched or smudged to oblivion, and some I'm upset about, because I may have to re-buy Ozzy Osbourne "Live & Loud" and Ozzy Osbourne Live At Budokan, unless I can ever find or afford a disc resurfacer.....

                                                                                        • Nate Davis
                                                                                          Nate Davis  1 weeks back

                                                                                          Back in the 90's I was sent a VHS tape with a pilot episode for a sitcom that never came out. It was labeled as self destructing, so I took the tape apart before playing and found a magnet against the tape on the empty roll side. I was able to easily remove it and make it repayable lol. I wonder if its still at my moms house somewhere.

                                                                                          • Thebluedud
                                                                                            Thebluedud  2 days back

                                                                                            Not gonna lie, that's pretty dann cool. I get the feeling that tape is probably worth something to someone somewhere...

                                                                                        • FSgt Cross
                                                                                          FSgt Cross  1 weeks back

                                                                                          0:12 I was going to comment about how he predicted it, but Disney+'s November 12th launch date was announced April 11, which was 17 days before this video was posted

                                                                                        • ITsJustPain
                                                                                          ITsJustPain  1 weeks back

                                                                                          I seriously thought this video was made 5 years ago.
                                                                                          You're probably more suited to writing. Production, design, personality, voice, it's all forgettable if not near unwatchable. Everything is mostly ok... but the audio makes it near unwatchable. There's a daaaam good reason it matters to hire professionals.